User Log In 
Foreign Language Schools in Armeniasp

Do you support the legislative initiative allowing public funding to be used for foreign language schools in Armenia?

Fully support
Do not support
Indifferent

Archive


ARMENIA-DIASPORA RELATIONS: 20 YEARS SINCE INDEPENDENCE

report


YEREVAN'S 2009 MUNICIPAL ELECTION

 


IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL CRISIS FOR ARMENIA

 


ARMENIA’S 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION


Law and Governance
High Court Refuses To Delay Armenian Vote

www.Armenialiberty.org
By Ruzanna Khachatrian
February 11, 2008

The Constitutional Court on Monday rejected former President Levon Ter-Petrosian’s demand to postpone Armenia’s presidential election by two weeks because of state television’s perceived biased coverage of his election campaign.

Under the Armenian Electoral Code, a presidential election can be put off if one of the candidates is deemed to be facing “insurmountable obstacles” during the campaign. If those obstacles are not eliminated by authorities within two weeks, the vote must be cancelled and held anew 40 days later.

In its appeal to the country’s highest judicial body, the Ter-Petrosian campaign claimed that the election coverage by the state-controlled Armenian Public Television, which has been highly critical of the ex-president, constitutes such an obstacle. Ter-Petrosian’s representatives spent more than an hour trying to substantiate the claim before the panel of nine judges headed by Gagik Harutiunian.

In particular, they cited examples of what they consider violations of legal provisions obligating Public Television to be impartial in its news coverage. One of them, Artak Zeynalian, said the Ter-Petrosian complained to the regulatory National Commission on Television and Radio (NCTR) but never received a reply.

In its verdict read out by Harutiunian, the Constitutional Court ruled that the alleged obstacles are not serious enough to be considered insurmountable. At the same time the court said after four-hour deliberations that Ter-Petrosian’s complaints are “legitimate” and should be addressed by the NCTR, the Central Election Commission and lower-level courts. It warned that their failure to do so could “generate distrust in the election process.”

Posted By: Moderator on Feb 13, 2008 11:10PM Add Comment

I'm sure G. Harutyunyan will
help LTP to become president. The postponing of the elecions is not in LTP's interests. He got what he wanted, "there were serious obstacles" confirmed by the highest body in Armenia.

Posted By: gago berlin on Feb 15, 2008 08:13AM

What is one to make of this. At first glance, the Constitutional Court seems to be rejecting LTP, but there seems to be a wink-wink and a nod in the Courts language. As in most other developed legal systems, a natural hierarchy (including agency implemented relief) must be adhered to before the highest court (or courts) subject a contest to their wrath. Here, the CC seems to be saying "go through the motions; we'll see what comes of it..."

Posted By: Edgar Martirosyan on Feb 16, 2008 09:28PM
November 2008
March 2008
February 2008
Matthew Karanian


Science, Technology, and Environment
Communication and Behavioral Sciences
Economics, Finance, Business, and Development
Human Rights, Society, and Religion
Politics and International Relations
Law and Governance
Copyright © 2010 PFA

Designed by Deem Communications. Developed by EctoStar Inc.